Dear readers,
15 years ago, when I was studying the path of migration
that took over the world of prehistoric people, I was concerned about the flow
of people from East Asia to the West. Later, with more materials, I completed
the treatise Out of Vietnam peopling on the world. Now, thanks to more
information from Western scholars' discussion of Indo-European origins, I
enlightened: it was a big mistake. There is no such thing as Indo-European.
India is only a living fossil that preserved the gen and language of Viet
ancestors from 40,000 years ago ... Only when returning to Viet-European we can
find the roots of people and European languages! Yes, history did that!
In the sixteenth century, Europeans traveling to the Indian
subcontinent, they recognized the similarities between Indo-Arya, Iranian and
European languages. In 1585 Filippo Sassetti, a Florence merchant, recorded
some similarities between Sanskrit and Italian. In 1647, Dutch linguist Marcus
Zuerius van Boxhorn noticed similarities in some Asian and European languages.
He thought they came from a common language called Scythia. The languages in
his hypothesis include Dutch, Albanian, Greek, Latin, Persian and German,
followed by Slavic languages, Celtic languages and Baltic languages. In 1813
Thomas Young first used the term Indo-European, based on the geographic
distribution of this system. Indo-European linguistics is a collection of more
than 400 languages that linguistic researchers believe share a common origin.
People who use the languages of this system live from India to Western Europe,
from the Mediterranean to Northern Europe, with about 3 billion people.
For more than 200 years, human and languages origins of
Indo-European have been interested in research on the basis of linguistics and
archeology with the aim of discovering pre-Indo-European languages
(Proto-Indo-Europen) PIE). Entering the new century, molecular biology has
important discoveries. Western scholars believe that the European population is
formed in three layers.
The first is European hunter-gatherer (EHG). Next came
farmers from West Asia, who made the first European peasant class (EEF) about
6000 years ago in western Anatolian and finally nomadic people from the Yamnaya
steppe in the Bronze Age, about 4000 - 3500 BC, carrying the pre-Indo-European
language (PIE), created the Indo-European language family.
Lithuanian-American archaeologist Marija Gimbutas proposed
the Kurgan hypothesis that the Proto-Indo-European (PIE) language originated in
the Pontiac steppe. During the Yamna period, one of the first Bronze Age
cultures in the world, Proto-Indo-European speakers in the Yamnaya region
(present-day Ukraine and Southern Russia) migrated west to Europe and east to
Central Asia. Then diverting South to the continent, carrying the Indo-European
languages used today in most of Europe, Iran and a large part of the Indian
subcontinent. The Kurgan model is the most widely accepted script of
Indo-European origin. However, the Western scholars' conclusion is unconvincing,
it is as unsteady as a beautiful house where the foundations are not fostered.
There seems to be a methodological problem here. Knowing that the European
population was made up of three classes of people, the researchers did not
trace to their biological and linguistic origins, but stopped at a later time,
causing their discussion came to lack of foundation.
In this treatise, I present other approach, going to the
ends of each class of people to explore their role in shaping the people and
voice of Europe.
I. Origin and process of forming European population.
The European population is made up of three classes.
Therefore, in order to know the history of forming European population, one
must understand to the end of the history of each of those classes.
1.The origin and the process of forming the European
hunter-gatherer community (EHG).
We know that, 200,000 years ago, Homo sapiens wise humans
with the three races of Australoid, Mongoloid and Europid appeared in South
Africa. In the process of living, they have separated into many groups with
different voices. However, there is still an original language of the ancestors
that made them understand each other. About 85,000 years ago, during the Ice
Age, the sea level was 130 meters lower today. People from Africa passed the
Red Sea gate to the Arabian Peninsula. Blocked into an ice barrier in the
north, the influx of migrants split in half. The Europid races stopped in
Yemen. The two big races Australoid and Mongoloid follow the Indian Ocean coast
to the East. 70,000 years ago, the main stream of the migration came to Vietnam
today and stopped (1). Two big races mixed blood, giving birth to four ancient
Viet strains: Indonesian, Melanesian, Vedoid and Negritoid of the same
Australoid type with majority Indonesian playing a social and linguistic
leadership (2). At first they hunted and gathered. Then settle down, combine
hunting with cultivating tubers, fruit trees, vegetables, beans, supplementing
the amount of food important for life. About 50,000 years ago, due to the
population explosion, people from Vietnam migrated to the islands of Southeast
Asia and the Indian subcontinent. 40,000 years ago, thanks to the improved
climate, people from Vietnam went up to occupy mainland China. From here a team
goes up to Siberia and 30,000 years ago, crossed the Bering Strait to conquer
America. From the west of mainland China, there is a flow of people passing
through Tibet, into Central Asia. Here, Viet people proliferate, increase in
numbers and then invade Europe. (1)
While the eastbound flow underwent such a journey, the
Europid race, surrounded by the icy cold, remained on the Arabian Peninsula.
52,000 years ago, thanks to a better climate, from Yemen, they moved to the
Middle East. 40,000 years ago, from the Middle East, they crossed the Bosporus
into Europe. In the land of modern today Turkey and Greece, Europids meet
Australoid Viet. The two races mixed blood gave birth to dark-colored people,
are the ancestors of today's European population. Europeans living on
hunt-gathering, spreading throughout Europe, are called European hunt-gathering
(EHG). This is the first class of population on European soil. About 25,000
years ago, an influx of EHG people from Europe entered Central Asia. Here, the
number increased, the flow of people headed East, (1,3) to the mainland of
China. At this time the tribes in the West of China have strengthened,
preventing the influx of people. The flow of people back north, to the Eastern
European grasslands, living by hunt-gathering. About 10,000 years ago, when the
Ice Age ended, they turned to domesticated sheep, goats, cows, and changed to a
nomadic way of life.
2. The formation of the European agricultural community.
Around 6000 BC, West Asian farmers brought wheat, grapes,
and cattle to modern-day Turkey, Greece, creating the first famers in Europe
(EEF). The Western Asian peasant, originally an Australoid Viet from Vietnam to
South Asia, immigrated to and merged with Europids from the Middle East came
to. After living by hunt-gathering, they turned to agriculture, building a
famous agricultural culture in the Crescent region. Coming to Europe, they
mixed blood with European hunters, diversifying the genome and voice of the
European population.
3. About Southern European nomads.
From Western Europe emigrated to 25,000 years ago, first
Europeans began to hunt-gathering in the vast ice fields of Southern Europe.
When the Ice Age ended, the glaciers turned into green steppe, they
domesticated cattle and switched to nomadic life. Around 4000 BC they tamed
horses, built wagons, owned the world's advanced means for breeding and
transport. Economic development has allowed the formation of large and powerful
nomadic tribes, capable of expanding the territory. About 3500 BC, they
followed the ancestral path before, going west, conquering the land of the
hunt-gatherers. They add their genetic and linguistic sources to European
families. Basically, their genome is still European so the genetic difference
between the lands is not so profound.
The above is a summary of the European population formation
process. Survey of European genomes today, Bryan sykes, author of Eva's Seven
Daughters, says that in European blood, only 20% of Western Asian peoples' DNA
is present, while 80% is European hunters. (4) This reflects the fact that the
subject of today's European population is descendant of the European
hunt-gathering class that was born 40,000 years ago (EHG). This truth also says
that the ancient Viet from East Asia contributed an important part to the blood
of Europe population
II. The formation of
the European language
Born and lived
together for more than hundred thousand years in Africa, the three Australoid,
Mongoloid and Europid races, besides their unique language, also share the
common vocabulary of the community on their motherland. Since migrating to the
Arabian Peninsula, the Europid community has only been hunting around the land.
52,000 years ago they made a brief migration to the Middle East and then
invaded Europe. Therefore, genetically and linguistically they did not change
significantly, almost still retain what brought from the mother land. In the
meantime, the Viet spread their long migration from the Arabian Peninsula to
Southeast Asia. In Vietnam, along with hunt-gathering, the Viet have created a
semi-domestically cultivated farming method of vegetables, tubers, and fruits,
(5) creating a plentiful food source for two population booms. From East Asia,
the Viet made a long migration to Europe. Take a day to go, learn a sieve of
wisdom. In the long journey not only to make a living but also to develop, the
Viet have learned many wise things. Also in the long time, through vast lands,
practicing many different jobs, Viet people create many new voices to
supplement their vocabulary. Therefore, when coming to Europe, contributing to
making Europeans, Viet people provide their descendants with a rich vocabulary
in addition to the inherent words of their ancestors. It was the first language
the European hunter-gatherer (EHG) possessed as they spread throughout Europe
and on its journey to the East, creating Inner Asia nomadic tribes.
During the Yamnaya pasture, thanks to the nomadic way of life, the community
created new vocabularies. Around 3500 BC, when migrating back to their former
homeland, Eastern nomads introduced nomadic vocabulary to the European
population, including the words horse, wagon, weave, wool ... Those are the
created new voices. However, it cannot be said that these words are the source
language of the European population (PIE). It is incomprehensible, for some
reason, a big race, was born 40,000 years ago but it took 34,000 years (4000
BC) to have its original voice, its roots! In fact, from the process of forming
the Western population, the original language of the European community (PIE)
is ancient Viet, dating from 40,000 years ago. It is the base language, so on
the basis of this vocabulary, Europe acquires new vocabulary, creating modern
European language.
Strong evidence for this statement is book L'annamite, mère
des langues: communauté d'origine des races celtiques, sémitiques, soudanaises
et de l'Indo-Chine (Annamite, mother of languages: community of origin. Celtic,
Semitic, Sudanese and Indo-Chinese) published by Henri Frey in Paris in 1892.
As a French Navy admiral who had worked in West Africa then went to Indochina,
Henri Frey realized that in the voices of the Vietnamese people, there were
many common vocabularíes with the languages of Africa, Celtic, Semitic, Sudan
... Do so he spent time researching and writing books. He made the comment:
Vietnamese is the mother of most Eastern and Western languages. Now we see, due
to the influence of the contemporary continental drift theory, he was wrong
when said that Vietnamese is the mother of the African language. But clearly,
with the nation lived out Africa, Vietnamese is the richest, worthy of being
the mother of the voice of the community outside Africa. This is also fully
consistent with the highest Vietnamese biodiversity index among Asians and the
migration of ancient Viet to Europe in the past.
The PIE story has something similar to the case of
Proto-Sino-Tibetan. From the middle of the nineteenth century, the term family
of Sino-Tibetan language was born, but hundreds of years later historical
linguists could not find the origin language of Sino-Tibetan language (PST). Explaining
this, they argued that: "Like in Europe, the discovery of PIE is
controversial. But not so that negatives Indo-European language. Similarly, not
because lack of PST, that rejected the Sino-Tibetan language!” Such a way of
thinking is hard to convince. Recently, there are opinions that the PST
appeared about 7,000 years ago, at the Yang shao culture in the Yellow River
basin. However, the truth is that from 40,000 years ago, the ancient Viet were
here to create the Jia hu agricultural culture with the first characters. Yang
shao culture is the descendant of Jia hu culture. Jia hu people brought millet
and rice to Yang shao.
Because of the Yang shao people exposured and crossbred with
North Mongoloid people on the banks of the Yellow River, born South Mongoloid
race and Mong-Viet hybrid voice. Based on that, it is thought that the voice of
the Yang shao residents is PST. However, in reality, the origin of the voice of
the Chinese population is Cantonese. But the ancestor of Cantonese was Nghe
Tinh language, because people from Nghe Tinh went up to Guangdong became
ancestors of Chinese human and voices.
III. Conclusion
When approaching the Eastern, Westerners realized that the
people of Northern India had similar skin tones and voices to Europeans. Because
India is an ancient country, with a big culture, Western scholars consider the
Indian language to be the root of the Western language. Since then the term
Indo-European was born. Today, from the discovery of genetics and archeology,
we know that 40,000 years ago, ancient Viet dominated the whole of East Asia.
An influx of Viet to the West has made an important contribution to the
European population and language. But about 7,000 years ago, in the Yellow
River basin, the Viet met and merged with the Mongoloid people, giving birth to
the Southern Mongoloid race. Southern Mongoloid people increased their
population and about 2000 BC replaced the Australoid, becoming the only race to
occupy the Eastern region. Meanwhile, Viet voice, like every other language born
from Africa, is polyphonic and tonless. But since the hieroglyphic word was
popularized, each word could only record one sound, so the sounds wanted to be
characterized. Therefore, the Eastern language became monophonic and tonal. Due
to changes in both anthropology and language, people of the Ancient Eastern
disappeared in the course of history. This makes posterity not known.
Therefore, when the people and languages of North India were discovered,
Western scholars mistakenly assumed that India was the source of people and
European languages.
Out of Vietnam peopling of the world (6)
However, the truth is, 40,000 years ago, while an influx of
ancient Viet from mainland China to the West, there was also influx of Viet
from the Southwestern to infiltrate Northwestern India. As we know, 50,000
years ago, Indonesian people from Vietnam came to occupy India, making the
first population of the subcontinent, later called Dravidian. In Northwest
India are also Indonesians descended from Vietnam 40,000 years ago. As such,
the North and the South Indians originated from Vietnam, with the same race,
language, and culture. From hunting, the North Indians turned to agriculture
and created the famous Indus river culture. Around 1500 BC, nomadic tribes from
Iran invaded India. During the course of their rule, they Aryanized people and
languages of Northern India. Before this situation, Western scholars classified
Sanskrit North Indian family into Indo-European language and said that Indians
are the source of Western population.
But the truth is not so. From the history of the formation
of the North Indian people and languages, we can say that North India is a
proxy on behalf of a community in the past that made people and voices of
Europe but later transformed into another form of anthropology and language
that the scientist did not recognize centuries ago. Now, thanks to new
knowledge, sciences that help us discover that, the ancient Viet have gone to
the Western, contributing to the creation of the European people and language.
This fact shows that it is time for Indians was fulfill their mission, to
return the role of ancient Viet in history. The Indo-European term returns the
role for the Viet-European term. This is perhaps the most important discovery
of contemporary history. From this
discovery we will be properly aware of European human and languages origins.
Saigon, Spring
2020
Conferences:
1.Stephen Oppenheimer. Out of Eden Peopling of the
World
(http://www.bradshawfoundation.com)
và Journey of Mankind
the Peopling of the World
(http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/journey/)
- From 65,000 to 52,000 years ago. The warmer climate of
52,000 years ago led groups of people from the Arabian Peninsula to the North,
to the Fertile Crescent and back to the Near East. From there they entered
Europe through the Bosporus, about 50,000 years ago.
- From 52,000 to 45,000 years ago. The Aurignacians with Old
Stone culture later moved from Turkey to Bulgaria in Europe. Neolithic appeared
in Hungary's Danube later in Austria.
- From 45,000 to 40,000 years ago The group from East Asia
moved westward through Central Asia and then north Asia. From Pakistan they
went to Central Asia and from Indochina via the Tebet region to the Qinh-hai
platea.
- From 40,000 to 25,000 years ago. People from Central Asia
traveled west to Eastern Europe, North to the Arctic Circle and to East Asia to
begin their advance toward the Northeastern continent of Eurasia. This period
appeared fine arts, such as the Chauvet cave in France
2. Nguyen Dinh Khoa. Southeast Asian Anthropology.
(University and Professional secondary Publishing House. H, 1983)
3. Radio-canada. La colonisation asiatique sous-estimée
http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/Science-Sante/2007/08/07/004-europe-colonisation-asie.shtml?ref=rss
“The migration of the population from Asia has played a
bigger role than those from Africa to European colonies, showing that dental
analyzes were done by European researchers. The colonization of continental
Europe will not take place after successive waves of migration from Africa, in
accordance with the widely held hypothesis. In fact, Asians will have a bigger
role than those from Africa to reside on the old continent millions of years
ago. Anthropologists from Spain, Italy and Georgia have come to this conclusion
after the genetic analysis of more than 5,000 fossil teeth from specimens of
African, Asian and Homo origin. This analysis shows that European teeth have
more Asian characteristics than Africa. This was verified in samples dating
back 1.8 million years until the arrival of Neanderthals, 250,000 years ago.
According to this analysis, this shows that the Eurasian population and the
African continent have been following different waves for a long time. Details
of this work are published in the Annals of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States (PNAS. 8. August 2007) ”Bryan Sykes. Bảy nàng con gái của
Eva. NXB Trẻ, 2008.
4.Bryan Sykes. Seven daughters of Eva. Tre Publishinh, 2008.
5.Ha Van Thuy. Con Co Ngua site and Vietnamese Prehistoric
Problems....
www.nhatbaovanhoa.com ›
di-chi-con-co-ngua-va-van-de-tien-su-ng...
6.The official migration routes of Asian prehistoric people.
Atkinson, Q. D., Gray, R. D. & Drummond, A. J. mtDNA
variation predicts population size in humans and reveals a major Southern Asian
chapter in human prehistory. Mol Biol Evol 25, 468–474 (2008).
